Delineating the development of the brain, cognition, and psychopathology with data science.
“Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art”
CV | ||
github | ||
google scholar | ||
Pines, Tozzi, Bertrand … & Williams
Pines, Keller, Larsen … & Satterthwaite, 2023
Pines, Larsen, Cui … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Pines, Cieslak, Larsen … & Satterthwaite, 2020
Pines, Sacchet, Kullar …. & Williams, 2018
Mehta, Pines, Adebimpe … & Satterthwaite, 2023
Cui, Pines, Larsen … & Sattherthwaite, 2022
Keller, Pines, Sydnor … & Satterthwaite, 2023
Williams, Pines, Rosas … & Ma, 2018
Li, Bailenson, Pines … & Williams, 2017
Ashourvan, Shah, Pines … & Litt, 2021
Murtha, Larsen, Pines … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Keller, Mackey, Pines … & Satterhtwaite, 2022
Keller, Sydnor, Pines … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Cieslak, Cook, He … & Sattherthwaite, 2022
Sydnor, Larsen, Bassett, … & Satterthwaite, 2021
Larsen, Cui, Adebimpe … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Shah, Ashourvan, Mikhail … & Davis, 2019
Shanmugan, Seidlitz, Cui … & Satterthwaite, 2021
Xia, Barnett, Tapera … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Baller, Valcarcel, Adebimpe … & Satterthwaite, 2022
Richie-Halford, Cieslak, Ai … & Rokem, 2022
Luo, Sydnor, Pines … & Satterthwaite
Zhou, Kim, Pines … & Bassett
Keller, Moore, Luo … & Barzilay
Yang, Wu, Li … & Cui
Hermosillo, Moore, Fezcko … & Fair
Vogel, Alexander-Bloch, Wagstyl … & Seidlitz
I’m a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford in the Williams PanLab researching how cognition and psychopathology interact in the developing brain. I recently completed a neuroscience PhD at the University of Pennsylvania with Ted Satterthwaite, where I studied normative neurocognitive development.
Out of respect for the complexity of the developing brain, I integrate across structural and functional neuroimages at multiple scales of analysis for broad and robust responses to my research questions. For example, in this paper, we wanted to use a precision network mapping approach to delineate individualized cortico-functional cogntiive development in youth. However, the cortex is organized into functional modules at multiple scales. By delineating personalized functional networks across coarse (e.g. 4 functional networks) to fine-grained partitions (e.g., 30 functional networks) in a large developmental cohort, we saw that individual variability in functional topography varies systematically across scales, and the development of functional networks unfolds differently at different scales, with coarse and fine-grained network development harboring distinct ramifications for neurocognitive development.
Out of respect for the scientific community and gratitude for previous generation of open-source scientific code, I’ve created walkthroughs for all of my code underlying every analysis in my first-author papers since learning how to code. All of the code within these walkthroughs (and the walkthroughs themselves) have been independently verified to work as intended by particularly stalwart co-authors. For example, in this pre-print, we were able to build off of fantastic code bases for spherical registration of cortical surfaces (freesurfer) and for tracing the migration of progenitor cells on spherical zebrafish gastrulas to construct, validate, hypothesis-test with, and dissemniate a pipeline for tracking and quantifying the hierarchical movement of cortical activity.
Outside of neuroscience, I am recently a lucky fiancé and a long-time mediocre improvisational musician, enjoy backpacking into the mountains with friends, am an ex-personal trainer, and am active in the great American folk science of meat smoking. Thanks for visiting my page, and feel free to reach out for inquiries.
Thanks for reading. Here are some findings I’d like to highlight:
Where in the cortex individual variability in functional arealization localizes is dependent on how granular your definition of functional networks is. More granular = more variability in higher-order cortices. From my nature comms paper.
Functional differentiation proceeds from lower-order to higher-order cortices in development, such that a single unimodal-to-transmodal gradient explains most (r^2=.71) of the developmental variability we observed across functional networks. Functional differentiation is associated with enhanced cognitive capacity, and de-differentiation seems to follow the same spatial trajectory years-to-decades later (still waiting to run this on full lifespan data). From my nature comms paper.
Hierarchical distance provides a parsimonious description of how individual edges in the functional connectome develop. Check out figure S9 to see how it lines up relative to other edge-level descriptions of neurodevelopment. From my nature comms paper.
Optical flow can be used to delineate bottom-up and top-down hierarchical propagations in fMRI data. From my neuron paper.
Both bottom-up and top-down propagations are common in all individuals we tested. 2 of 5 verifications of this finding depicted in this figure. From my neuron paper.
Top-down propagations become increasingly prominent over neurodevelopment. Not pictured is the same results 100% holding after controlling for previously known properties of functional neurodevelopment. From my neuron paper.
Multi-shell diffusion weighted imaging can be leveraged to confer increased sensitivity to neurodevelopmental effects and decreased sensitivity to the confounding influence of head motion in neurodevelopmental studies. Schematic from my developmental cog. neurosci. paper.
“Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art; it arises in hypothesis and flows into achievement. Philosophy is a hypothetical interpretation of the unknown (as in metaphysics), or of the inexactly known (as in ethics or political philosophy); it is the front trench in the siege of truth. Science is the captured territory; and behind it are those secure regions in which knowledge and art build our imperfect and marvelous world” - Durant